{"id":823,"date":"2020-03-08T18:50:08","date_gmt":"2020-03-08T17:50:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.fr\/?p=823"},"modified":"2020-03-16T10:34:17","modified_gmt":"2020-03-16T09:34:17","slug":"loi-pacte-nouvelle-procedure-dopposition-en-matiere-de-marques","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/loi-pacte-nouvelle-procedure-dopposition-en-matiere-de-marques\/","title":{"rendered":"Loi PACTE : nouvelle proc\u00e9dure d&rsquo;opposition en mati\u00e8re de marques"},"content":{"rendered":"<span class=\"rt-reading-time\" style=\"display: block;\"><span class=\"rt-label rt-prefix\">tdl<\/span> <span class=\"rt-time\">&lt;\u00a01<\/span> <span class=\"rt-label rt-postfix\">minute<\/span><\/span>\n<p>La <a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/affichTexte.do?cidTexte=JORFTEXT000038496102&amp;categorieLien=id\" class=\"broken_link\">LOI n\u00b0 2019-486<\/a> du\u00a022 mai 2019, dite loi PACTE a un impact cons\u00e9quent en mati\u00e8re de marques au niveau national.<br>Loi PACTE pr\u00e9voit la transposition dans le droit national de la directive (UE) 2015\/2436 et du r\u00e8glement (UE) 2017\/1001.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ces dispositions se traduisent notamment par la mise en place d&rsquo;un nouveau portail d&rsquo;opposition en mati\u00e8re de marques, \u00e0 retrouver sur le site de l&rsquo;INPI.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.inpi.fr\/fr\/nationales\/loi-pacte-les-dispositions-de-la-nouvelle-procedure-d-opposition-en-matiere-de-marques\" class=\"broken_link\">Plus d&rsquo;informations sur le site de l&rsquo;INPI.<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p><span class=\"rt-reading-time\" style=\"display: block;\"><span class=\"rt-label rt-prefix\">tdl<\/span> <span class=\"rt-time\">&lt;\u00a01<\/span> <span class=\"rt-label rt-postfix\">minute<\/span><\/span> La loi PACTE modifie entre autres la proc\u00e9dure d&rsquo;opposition envers une marque. Le nouveau portail d&rsquo;opposition est d\u00e9sormais utilisable.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"link","meta":{"sfsi_plus_gutenberg_text_before_share":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_show_text_before_share":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_icon_type":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_icon_alignemt":"","sfsi_plus_gutenburg_max_per_row":"","spay_email":""},"categories":[207],"tags":[215,227,229,231],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/823"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=823"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/823\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1326,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/823\/revisions\/1326"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=823"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=823"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=823"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}