{"id":3824,"date":"2022-12-22T08:00:00","date_gmt":"2022-12-22T06:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/?p=3824"},"modified":"2022-12-01T12:11:25","modified_gmt":"2022-12-01T10:11:25","slug":"depot-de-marque-et-vie-des-affaires-un-element-essentiel-a-la-caracterisation-de-la-contrefacon","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/depot-de-marque-et-vie-des-affaires-un-element-essentiel-a-la-caracterisation-de-la-contrefacon\/","title":{"rendered":"D\u00e9p\u00f4t de marque et vie des affaires : un \u00e9l\u00e9ment essentiel \u00e0 la caract\u00e9risation de la contrefa\u00e7on"},"content":{"rendered":"<span class=\"rt-reading-time\" style=\"display: block;\"><span class=\"rt-label rt-prefix\">tdl<\/span> <span class=\"rt-time\">&lt;\u00a01<\/span> <span class=\"rt-label rt-postfix\">minute<\/span><\/span>\n<div class=\"wp-block-cover\"><span aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-cover__gradient-background has-background-dim\"><\/span><img loading=\"lazy\" width=\"676\" height=\"947\" class=\"wp-block-cover__image-background wp-image-1605\" alt=\"\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.wine-law.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/wesley-tingey-9z9fxr_7Z-k-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=676%2C947&#038;ssl=1\" data-object-fit=\"cover\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.wine-law.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/wesley-tingey-9z9fxr_7Z-k-unsplash-scaled.jpg?w=1828&amp;ssl=1 1828w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.wine-law.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/wesley-tingey-9z9fxr_7Z-k-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=214%2C300&amp;ssl=1 214w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.wine-law.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/wesley-tingey-9z9fxr_7Z-k-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=731%2C1024&amp;ssl=1 731w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.wine-law.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/wesley-tingey-9z9fxr_7Z-k-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=768%2C1075&amp;ssl=1 768w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.wine-law.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/wesley-tingey-9z9fxr_7Z-k-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=1097%2C1536&amp;ssl=1 1097w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.wine-law.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/wesley-tingey-9z9fxr_7Z-k-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=1463%2C2048&amp;ssl=1 1463w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.wine-law.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/wesley-tingey-9z9fxr_7Z-k-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=600%2C840&amp;ssl=1 600w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.wine-law.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/wesley-tingey-9z9fxr_7Z-k-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=945%2C1323&amp;ssl=1 945w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.wine-law.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/wesley-tingey-9z9fxr_7Z-k-unsplash-scaled.jpg?w=1352&amp;ssl=1 1352w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 676px) 100vw, 676px\" data-recalc-dims=\"1\" \/><div class=\"wp-block-cover__inner-container\">\n<p class=\"has-text-align-center has-regular-font-size\">La Cour de cassation a rendu deux arr\u00eat en date du 13 octobre 2021 au sujet de deux marques, poursuivies pour contrefa\u00e7on sans qu&rsquo;elles aient r\u00e9ellement mises sur le march\u00e9. La Cour a saisi cette opportunit\u00e9 pour effectuer un revirement de sa jurisprudence en mati\u00e8re de contrefa\u00e7on en indiquant que le d\u00e9p\u00f4t de marque ne suffit pas \u00e0 caract\u00e9riser la contrefa\u00e7on, il faut que la marque litigieuse soit pr\u00e9sente dans la vie des affaire.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/novagraaf.com\/fr\/vision\/contrefacon-le-seul-depot-dune-marque-ne-suffit-pas\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Voir l&rsquo;article sur le site de Novagraaf. <\/a> <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p><span class=\"rt-reading-time\" style=\"display: block;\"><span class=\"rt-label rt-prefix\">tdl<\/span> <span class=\"rt-time\">&lt;\u00a01<\/span> <span class=\"rt-label rt-postfix\">minute<\/span><\/span> Voir l&rsquo;article sur le site de Novagraaf.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"link","meta":{"sfsi_plus_gutenberg_text_before_share":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_show_text_before_share":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_icon_type":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_icon_alignemt":"","sfsi_plus_gutenburg_max_per_row":"","spay_email":""},"categories":[203,207],"tags":[425],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3824"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3824"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3824\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3825,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3824\/revisions\/3825"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3824"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3824"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3824"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}