{"id":3817,"date":"2022-12-08T08:00:00","date_gmt":"2022-12-08T06:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/?p=3817"},"modified":"2022-12-01T11:45:00","modified_gmt":"2022-12-01T09:45:00","slug":"origin-et-origine-1927-ne-sont-pas-susceptibles-de-creer-un-risque-de-confusion","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/origin-et-origine-1927-ne-sont-pas-susceptibles-de-creer-un-risque-de-confusion\/","title":{"rendered":"ORIGIN et ORIGINE 1927 ne sont pas susceptibles de cr\u00e9er un risque de confusion"},"content":{"rendered":"<span class=\"rt-reading-time\" style=\"display: block;\"><span class=\"rt-label rt-prefix\">tdl<\/span> <span class=\"rt-time\">&lt;\u00a01<\/span> <span class=\"rt-label rt-postfix\">minute<\/span><\/span>\n<div class=\"wp-block-cover\"><span aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-cover__gradient-background has-background-dim\"><\/span><img loading=\"lazy\" width=\"676\" height=\"947\" class=\"wp-block-cover__image-background wp-image-1605\" alt=\"\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.wine-law.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/wesley-tingey-9z9fxr_7Z-k-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=676%2C947&#038;ssl=1\" data-object-fit=\"cover\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.wine-law.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/wesley-tingey-9z9fxr_7Z-k-unsplash-scaled.jpg?w=1828&amp;ssl=1 1828w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.wine-law.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/wesley-tingey-9z9fxr_7Z-k-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=214%2C300&amp;ssl=1 214w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.wine-law.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/wesley-tingey-9z9fxr_7Z-k-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=731%2C1024&amp;ssl=1 731w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.wine-law.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/wesley-tingey-9z9fxr_7Z-k-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=768%2C1075&amp;ssl=1 768w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.wine-law.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/wesley-tingey-9z9fxr_7Z-k-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=1097%2C1536&amp;ssl=1 1097w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.wine-law.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/wesley-tingey-9z9fxr_7Z-k-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=1463%2C2048&amp;ssl=1 1463w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.wine-law.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/wesley-tingey-9z9fxr_7Z-k-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=600%2C840&amp;ssl=1 600w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.wine-law.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/wesley-tingey-9z9fxr_7Z-k-unsplash-scaled.jpg?resize=945%2C1323&amp;ssl=1 945w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.wine-law.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/wesley-tingey-9z9fxr_7Z-k-unsplash-scaled.jpg?w=1352&amp;ssl=1 1352w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 676px) 100vw, 676px\" data-recalc-dims=\"1\" \/><div class=\"wp-block-cover__inner-container\">\n<p class=\"has-text-align-center has-regular-font-size\">La marque ant\u00e9rieure ORIGIN s&rsquo;est oppos\u00e9e \u00e0 la demande d&rsquo;enregistrement de la marque ORIGINE 1927, toutes deux se rapportant \u00e0 des vins. L&rsquo;a Cour d&rsquo;appel de Paris, par un arr\u00eat du 3 juin 2022 a conclu \u00e0 une absence de risque de confusion entre les deux marques, du fait de l&rsquo;expression arbitraire constitu\u00e9e par l&rsquo;association entre la date \u00ab\u00a01927\u00a0\u00bb et le mot \u00ab\u00a0origine\u00a0\u00bb, qui suppose un lien avec l&rsquo;histoire.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/pibd.inpi.fr\/article\/absence-de-risque-de-confusion-entre-la-marque-de-lue-anterieure-origin-et-la-marque\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Voir l&rsquo;article sur le site de L&rsquo;INPI (inscription gratuite pour l&rsquo;acc\u00e8s en lecture de l&rsquo;article). <\/a> <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p><span class=\"rt-reading-time\" style=\"display: block;\"><span class=\"rt-label rt-prefix\">tdl<\/span> <span class=\"rt-time\">&lt;\u00a01<\/span> <span class=\"rt-label rt-postfix\">minute<\/span><\/span> Voir l&rsquo;article sur le site de L&rsquo;INPI (inscription gratuite pour l&rsquo;acc\u00e8s en lecture de l&rsquo;article).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"link","meta":{"sfsi_plus_gutenberg_text_before_share":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_show_text_before_share":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_icon_type":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_icon_alignemt":"","sfsi_plus_gutenburg_max_per_row":"","spay_email":""},"categories":[203,207],"tags":[219],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3817"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3817"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3817\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3818,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3817\/revisions\/3818"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3817"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3817"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3817"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}