{"id":3289,"date":"2021-12-01T08:00:00","date_gmt":"2021-12-01T06:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/?p=3289"},"modified":"2021-12-02T10:33:03","modified_gmt":"2021-12-02T08:33:03","slug":"jus-vini-2-2021-case-law-preview-une-appellation-dorigine-est-protegee-contre-son-evocation-par-un-prestataire-de-services-cjue-9-septembre-2021-j-cayron-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/en\/jus-vini-2-2021-case-law-preview-une-appellation-dorigine-est-protegee-contre-son-evocation-par-un-prestataire-de-services-cjue-9-septembre-2021-j-cayron-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Jus Vini 2\/2021 &#8211; Case-law preview &#8211; Une appellation d&rsquo;origine est prot\u00e9g\u00e9e contre son \u00e9vocation par un prestataire de services &#8211; CJUE, 9 septembre 2021 (J. Cayron)"},"content":{"rendered":"<span class=\"rt-reading-time\" style=\"display: block;\"><span class=\"rt-label rt-prefix\">tdl<\/span> <span class=\"rt-time\">&lt;\u00a01<\/span> <span class=\"rt-label rt-postfix\">minute<\/span><\/span>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" width=\"676\" height=\"956\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.wine-law.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/image-3.png?resize=676%2C956&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-3290\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.wine-law.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/image-3.png?w=682&amp;ssl=1 682w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.wine-law.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/image-3.png?resize=212%2C300&amp;ssl=1 212w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.wine-law.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/image-3.png?resize=600%2C848&amp;ssl=1 600w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 676px) 100vw, 676px\" data-recalc-dims=\"1\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" width=\"676\" height=\"956\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.wine-law.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/image-4.png?resize=676%2C956&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-3291\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.wine-law.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/image-4.png?w=682&amp;ssl=1 682w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.wine-law.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/image-4.png?resize=212%2C300&amp;ssl=1 212w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.wine-law.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/image-4.png?resize=600%2C848&amp;ssl=1 600w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 676px) 100vw, 676px\" data-recalc-dims=\"1\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p><span class=\"rt-reading-time\" style=\"display: block;\"><span class=\"rt-label rt-prefix\">tdl<\/span> <span class=\"rt-time\">&lt;\u00a01<\/span> <span class=\"rt-label rt-postfix\">minute<\/span><\/span> Jus Vini n\u00b02\/2021 reveales itself in a preview of the Case-law commentary of CJUE, 9 september 2021, C-783\/19 : Une appellation d&rsquo;origine est prot\u00e9g\u00e9e contre son \u00e9vocation par un prestataire de services, by Jocelyne Cayron.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"status","meta":{"sfsi_plus_gutenberg_text_before_share":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_show_text_before_share":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_icon_type":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_icon_alignemt":"","sfsi_plus_gutenburg_max_per_row":"","spay_email":""},"categories":[52,58,265],"tags":[572],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3289"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3289"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3289\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3292,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3289\/revisions\/3292"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3289"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3289"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3289"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}