{"id":3280,"date":"2021-11-30T11:00:00","date_gmt":"2021-11-30T09:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/?p=3280"},"modified":"2021-12-02T10:22:20","modified_gmt":"2021-12-02T08:22:20","slug":"jus-vini-2-2021-case-law-preview-une-appellation-dorigine-est-protegee-contre-son-evocation-par-un-prestataire-de-services-cjue-9-septembre-2021-j-cayron","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/jus-vini-2-2021-case-law-preview-une-appellation-dorigine-est-protegee-contre-son-evocation-par-un-prestataire-de-services-cjue-9-septembre-2021-j-cayron\/","title":{"rendered":"Jus Vini 2\/2021 &#8211; Case-law preview &#8211; Une appellation d&rsquo;origine est prot\u00e9g\u00e9e contre son \u00e9vocation par un prestataire de services &#8211; CJUE, 9 septembre 2021 (J. Cayron)"},"content":{"rendered":"<span class=\"rt-reading-time\" style=\"display: block;\"><span class=\"rt-label rt-prefix\">tdl<\/span> <span class=\"rt-time\">&lt;\u00a01<\/span> <span class=\"rt-label rt-postfix\">minute<\/span><\/span>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large is-resized\"><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.wine-law.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/image-5.png?resize=580%2C820&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-3281\" width=\"580\" height=\"820\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.wine-law.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/image-5.png?w=606&amp;ssl=1 606w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.wine-law.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/image-5.png?resize=212%2C300&amp;ssl=1 212w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.wine-law.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/image-5.png?resize=600%2C849&amp;ssl=1 600w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 580px) 100vw, 580px\" data-recalc-dims=\"1\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" width=\"606\" height=\"857\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.wine-law.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/image-6.png?resize=606%2C857&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-3282\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.wine-law.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/image-6.png?w=606&amp;ssl=1 606w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.wine-law.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/image-6.png?resize=212%2C300&amp;ssl=1 212w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.wine-law.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/image-6.png?resize=600%2C849&amp;ssl=1 600w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 606px) 100vw, 606px\" data-recalc-dims=\"1\" \/><\/figure>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p><span class=\"rt-reading-time\" style=\"display: block;\"><span class=\"rt-label rt-prefix\">tdl<\/span> <span class=\"rt-time\">&lt;\u00a01<\/span> <span class=\"rt-label rt-postfix\">minute<\/span><\/span> Jus Vini n\u00b02\/2021 se d\u00e9voile en avant-premi\u00e8re avec le r\u00e9sum\u00e9 et le plan d&rsquo;un commentaire de la jurisprudence CJUE, 9 SEPTEMBRE 2021, C\u2011783\/19 : Une appellation d&rsquo;origine est prot\u00e9g\u00e9e contre son \u00e9vocation par un prestataire de services, par Jocelyne Cayron.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"status","meta":{"sfsi_plus_gutenberg_text_before_share":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_show_text_before_share":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_icon_type":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_icon_alignemt":"","sfsi_plus_gutenburg_max_per_row":"","spay_email":""},"categories":[9,10,263],"tags":[570],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3280"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3280"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3280\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3283,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3280\/revisions\/3283"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3280"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3280"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3280"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}