{"id":3018,"date":"2021-07-08T08:00:00","date_gmt":"2021-07-08T06:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/?p=3018"},"modified":"2021-07-02T15:44:35","modified_gmt":"2021-07-02T13:44:35","slug":"the-munich-higher-regional-court-gives-credit-to-the-champagne-pdo","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/en\/the-munich-higher-regional-court-gives-credit-to-the-champagne-pdo\/","title":{"rendered":"The Munich Higher Regional Court gives credit to the Champagne PDO"},"content":{"rendered":"<span class=\"rt-reading-time\" style=\"display: block;\"><span class=\"rt-label rt-prefix\">tdl<\/span> <span class=\"rt-time\">&lt;\u00a01<\/span> <span class=\"rt-label rt-postfix\">minute<\/span><\/span>\n<div class=\"wp-block-cover has-background-dim\" style=\"background-image:url(https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/ho-hyou-J9gOVV85RTA-unsplash-1-scaled.jpg)\"><div class=\"wp-block-cover__inner-container\">\n<p class=\"has-text-align-center has-large-font-size\">The case is well known: an ice cream with Champagne as an ingredient was briefly sold by Aldi. The Comit\u00e9 Champagne opposed Aldi the status of Champagne as a Protected Designation of Origin. After several decisions brought by the German and european authorities, the Munich Higher Regional Court gives credit to the world&rsquo;s most famous PDO.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.decanter.com\/wine-news\/champagne-sorbet-dispute-sees-new-court-ruling-461227\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Find the article on Decanter.<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p><span class=\"rt-reading-time\" style=\"display: block;\"><span class=\"rt-label rt-prefix\">tdl<\/span> <span class=\"rt-time\">&lt;\u00a01<\/span> <span class=\"rt-label rt-postfix\">minute<\/span><\/span> Find the article on Decanter.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"link","meta":{"sfsi_plus_gutenberg_text_before_share":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_show_text_before_share":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_icon_type":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_icon_alignemt":"","sfsi_plus_gutenburg_max_per_row":"","spay_email":""},"categories":[183,335],"tags":[397],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3018"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3018"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3018\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3020,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3018\/revisions\/3020"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3018"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3018"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3018"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}