{"id":3015,"date":"2021-07-08T08:00:00","date_gmt":"2021-07-08T06:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/?p=3015"},"modified":"2021-07-02T15:37:16","modified_gmt":"2021-07-02T13:37:16","slug":"la-haute-cour-federale-allemande-tranche-en-defaveur-du-champagne-sorbet","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/la-haute-cour-federale-allemande-tranche-en-defaveur-du-champagne-sorbet\/","title":{"rendered":"La Haute Cour F\u00e9d\u00e9rale allemande tranche en d\u00e9faveur du \u00ab\u00a0Champagne Sorbet\u00a0\u00bb"},"content":{"rendered":"<span class=\"rt-reading-time\" style=\"display: block;\"><span class=\"rt-label rt-prefix\">tdl<\/span> <span class=\"rt-time\">&lt;\u00a01<\/span> <span class=\"rt-label rt-postfix\">minute<\/span><\/span>\n<div class=\"wp-block-cover has-background-dim\" style=\"background-image:url(https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/ho-hyou-J9gOVV85RTA-unsplash-scaled.jpg)\"><div class=\"wp-block-cover__inner-container\">\n<p class=\"has-text-align-center has-large-font-size\">L&rsquo;affaire est connue, le Comit\u00e9 Champagne a saisit la justice allemande au sujet d&rsquo;une glace commercialis\u00e9e par Aldi, qui aurait un go\u00fbt de Champagne. Apr\u00e8s plusieurs d\u00e9cisions, comportant leur lot de retournements, la Haute Cour F\u00e9d\u00e9rale allemande tranche en faveur de l&rsquo;appellation Champagne.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/lachampagnedesophieclaeys.fr\/pas-de-sorbet-au-champagne-au-gout-de-poire-pour-aldi\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Voir l&rsquo;article sur la Champagne de Sophie Claeys.<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p><span class=\"rt-reading-time\" style=\"display: block;\"><span class=\"rt-label rt-prefix\">tdl<\/span> <span class=\"rt-time\">&lt;\u00a01<\/span> <span class=\"rt-label rt-postfix\">minute<\/span><\/span> Voir l&rsquo;article sur la Champagne de Sophie Claeys.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"link","meta":{"sfsi_plus_gutenberg_text_before_share":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_show_text_before_share":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_icon_type":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_icon_alignemt":"","sfsi_plus_gutenburg_max_per_row":"","spay_email":""},"categories":[185,333],"tags":[395],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3015"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3015"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3015\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3017,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3015\/revisions\/3017"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3015"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3015"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3015"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}