{"id":3011,"date":"2021-07-06T08:00:00","date_gmt":"2021-07-06T06:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/?p=3011"},"modified":"2021-07-02T15:27:03","modified_gmt":"2021-07-02T13:27:03","slug":"une-marque-shampina-refusee-a-lenregistrement-au-perou","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/une-marque-shampina-refusee-a-lenregistrement-au-perou\/","title":{"rendered":"Une marque \u00ab\u00a0Shampi\u00f1a\u00a0\u00bb refus\u00e9e \u00e0 l&rsquo;enregistrement au P\u00e9rou"},"content":{"rendered":"<span class=\"rt-reading-time\" style=\"display: block;\"><span class=\"rt-label rt-prefix\">tdl<\/span> <span class=\"rt-time\">&lt;\u00a01<\/span> <span class=\"rt-label rt-postfix\">minute<\/span><\/span>\n<div class=\"wp-block-cover has-background-dim\" style=\"background-image:url(https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/pineapple-supply-co-3Vr4qQvQn34-unsplash.jpg)\"><div class=\"wp-block-cover__inner-container\">\n<p class=\"has-text-align-center has-large-font-size\">Le Comit\u00e9 Champagne avait saisit en 2019 l&rsquo;office de la propri\u00e9t\u00e9 intellectuelle p\u00e9ruvien suite \u00e0 la demande d&rsquo;enregistrement d&rsquo;une marque \u00ab\u00a0Shampi\u00f1a\u00a0\u00bb, \u00e0 base d&rsquo;ananas. L&rsquo;Office a donn\u00e9 raison \u00e0 l&rsquo;appellation Champagne.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/lachampagnedesophieclaeys.fr\/appellation-champagne-pas-de-shampina-au-perou\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Voir l&rsquo;article sur la Champagne de Sophie Claeys.<\/a> <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p><span class=\"rt-reading-time\" style=\"display: block;\"><span class=\"rt-label rt-prefix\">tdl<\/span> <span class=\"rt-time\">&lt;\u00a01<\/span> <span class=\"rt-label rt-postfix\">minute<\/span><\/span> Voir l&rsquo;article sur la Champagne de Sophie Claeys.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"link","meta":{"sfsi_plus_gutenberg_text_before_share":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_show_text_before_share":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_icon_type":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_icon_alignemt":"","sfsi_plus_gutenburg_max_per_row":"","spay_email":""},"categories":[185,347],"tags":[241,381],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3011"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3011"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3011\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3013,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3011\/revisions\/3013"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3011"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3011"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3011"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}