{"id":2840,"date":"2021-05-21T08:00:00","date_gmt":"2021-05-21T06:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/?p=2840"},"modified":"2021-05-20T15:45:01","modified_gmt":"2021-05-20T13:45:01","slug":"nom-patronymique-et-marque","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/nom-patronymique-et-marque\/","title":{"rendered":"Nom patronymique et enregistrement de marque"},"content":{"rendered":"<span class=\"span-reading-time rt-reading-time\" style=\"display: block;\"><span class=\"rt-label rt-prefix\">tdl<\/span> <span class=\"rt-time\"> &lt;\u00a01<\/span> <span class=\"rt-label rt-postfix\">minute<\/span><\/span>\n<div class=\"wp-block-cover has-background-dim\" style=\"background-image:url(https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/austin-kirk-cHX_Eih2hkY-unsplash-scaled.jpg)\"><div class=\"wp-block-cover__inner-container is-layout-flow wp-block-cover-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"has-text-align-center has-large-font-size wp-block-paragraph\">L&rsquo;affaire connue dans la fili\u00e8re Champagne de Taittinger est une illustration bien connue de l&rsquo;utilisation d&rsquo;un nom patronymique en tant que marque. La Cour de cassation vient de d\u00e9livrer un arr\u00eat sur le m\u00eame sujet.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.novagraaf.com\/fr\/vision\/peut-exploiter-son-nom-patronymique-pour-une-activite-commerciale-lorsque-ce-meme-nom-est\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Voir l&rsquo;article sur Novagraaf.<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p><span class=\"span-reading-time rt-reading-time\" style=\"display: block;\"><span class=\"rt-label rt-prefix\">tdl<\/span> <span class=\"rt-time\"> &lt;\u00a01<\/span> <span class=\"rt-label rt-postfix\">minute<\/span><\/span>Voir l&rsquo;article sur Novagraaf.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"link","meta":{"sfsi_plus_gutenberg_text_before_share":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_show_text_before_share":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_icon_type":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_icon_alignemt":"","sfsi_plus_gutenburg_max_per_row":"","_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[207],"tags":[623],"class_list":["post-2840","post","type-post","status-publish","format-link","hentry","category-droit-des-marques","tag-nom-patronymique","post_format-post-format-link"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"post_mailing_queue_ids":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2840","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2840"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2840\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2843,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2840\/revisions\/2843"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2840"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2840"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2840"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}