{"id":2802,"date":"2021-04-29T08:00:00","date_gmt":"2021-04-29T06:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/?p=2802"},"modified":"2021-04-25T18:39:02","modified_gmt":"2021-04-25T16:39:02","slug":"cassis-de-dijon-lemporte-sur-la-chine","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/cassis-de-dijon-lemporte-sur-la-chine\/","title":{"rendered":"Cassis de Dijon l&#8217;emporte sur la Chine"},"content":{"rendered":"<span class=\"rt-reading-time\" style=\"display: block;\"><span class=\"rt-label rt-prefix\">tdl<\/span> <span class=\"rt-time\">&lt;\u00a01<\/span> <span class=\"rt-label rt-postfix\">minute<\/span><\/span>\n<div class=\"wp-block-cover has-background-dim\" style=\"background-image:url(https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/monika-grabkowska-ZcbvLO536zU-unsplash-scaled.jpg)\"><div class=\"wp-block-cover__inner-container\">\n<p class=\"has-text-align-center has-large-font-size\">L&rsquo;affaire \u00e9tait \u00e0 l&rsquo;\u00e9tude depuis quelques temps d\u00e9j\u00e0. En 2019, une marque \u00ab\u00a0Dijon\u00a0\u00bb a \u00e9t\u00e9 propos\u00e9e \u00e0 l&rsquo;enregistrement en Chine. L&rsquo;INAO a alors alert\u00e9 sur le risque avec l&rsquo;IGP bien connue des juristes. Dans une d\u00e9cision r\u00e9cente, l&rsquo;organisme chinois de protection des droits de propri\u00e9t\u00e9 a donn\u00e9 raison \u00e0 l&rsquo;INAO.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/amp-lefigaro-fr.cdn.ampproject.org\/c\/s\/amp.lefigaro.fr\/flash-eco\/il-n-y-aura-pas-de-creme-de-cassis-de-dijon-made-in-china-20210419\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Voir l&rsquo;article sur Le Figaro. <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p><span class=\"rt-reading-time\" style=\"display: block;\"><span class=\"rt-label rt-prefix\">tdl<\/span> <span class=\"rt-time\">&lt;\u00a01<\/span> <span class=\"rt-label rt-postfix\">minute<\/span><\/span> Voir l&rsquo;article sur Le Figaro.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"link","meta":{"sfsi_plus_gutenberg_text_before_share":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_show_text_before_share":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_icon_type":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_icon_alignemt":"","sfsi_plus_gutenburg_max_per_row":"","spay_email":""},"categories":[329],"tags":[601],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2802"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2802"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2802\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2804,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2802\/revisions\/2804"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2802"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2802"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2802"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}