{"id":2506,"date":"2021-01-14T08:00:00","date_gmt":"2021-01-14T06:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/?p=2506"},"modified":"2021-01-12T12:27:44","modified_gmt":"2021-01-12T10:27:44","slug":"clauses-reputees-non-ecrites-et-baux-conclus-avant-la-loi-pinel","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/clauses-reputees-non-ecrites-et-baux-conclus-avant-la-loi-pinel\/","title":{"rendered":"Clauses r\u00e9put\u00e9es non \u00e9crites et baux conclus avant la loi Pinel"},"content":{"rendered":"<span class=\"rt-reading-time\" style=\"display: block;\"><span class=\"rt-label rt-prefix\">tdl<\/span> <span class=\"rt-time\">&lt;\u00a01<\/span> <span class=\"rt-label rt-postfix\">minute<\/span><\/span>\n<div class=\"wp-block-cover has-background-dim\" style=\"background-image:url(https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/wesley-tingey-9z9fxr_7Z-k-unsplash-1-731x1024.jpg)\"><div class=\"wp-block-cover__inner-container\">\n<p class=\"has-text-align-center has-large-font-size\">La Cour de cassation a rendu un arr\u00eat en novembre 2020 au sujet des clauses r\u00e9put\u00e9es non \u00e9crites, notamment sur les clauses contraires \u00e0 l&rsquo;article L. 145-15 du Code de commerce.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/droit-des-affaires.efe.fr\/2020\/12\/10\/clauses-reputees-non-ecrites-la-cour-de-cassation-precise-le-regime-des-clauses-contraires-a-larticle-l-145-15-du-code-de-commerce\/?utm_source=dlvr.it&amp;utm_medium=linkedin\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Voir le commentaire sur droitdesaffaires.fr.<\/a> <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p><span class=\"rt-reading-time\" style=\"display: block;\"><span class=\"rt-label rt-prefix\">tdl<\/span> <span class=\"rt-time\">&lt;\u00a01<\/span> <span class=\"rt-label rt-postfix\">minute<\/span><\/span> Voir le commentaire sur droitdesaffaires.fr.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"link","meta":{"sfsi_plus_gutenberg_text_before_share":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_show_text_before_share":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_icon_type":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_icon_alignemt":"","sfsi_plus_gutenburg_max_per_row":"","spay_email":""},"categories":[379],"tags":[580],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2506"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2506"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2506\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2508,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2506\/revisions\/2508"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2506"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2506"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2506"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}