{"id":1986,"date":"2020-06-29T05:46:00","date_gmt":"2020-06-29T04:46:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/?p=1986"},"modified":"2020-06-29T13:54:08","modified_gmt":"2020-06-29T12:54:08","slug":"appellations-of-origin-names-and-protection","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/en\/appellations-of-origin-names-and-protection\/","title":{"rendered":"Appellations of origin, names and protection"},"content":{"rendered":"<span class=\"rt-reading-time\" style=\"display: block;\"><span class=\"rt-label rt-prefix\">tdl<\/span> <span class=\"rt-time\">&lt;\u00a01<\/span> <span class=\"rt-label rt-postfix\">minute<\/span><\/span>\n<div class=\"wp-block-cover has-background-dim\" style=\"background-image:url(https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/scott-warman-h4AGlo55tTA-unsplash-1024x683.jpg)\"><div class=\"wp-block-cover__inner-container\">\n<p class=\"has-text-align-center has-large-font-size\">In order to protect their products, winegrowers over the world had to protect their wine from unlegitimate usage. Over the centuries, it seems that the designated way of protection for a product was its name.<br>Then one understand the absolut necessity of the strong protection of a product&rsquo;s name by a the legal way.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.winespectator.com\/articles\/champagne-vs-bread-prosecco-vs-nosecco-jam-vs-jammy-trademark-battles-erupt-unfiltered\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" class=\"broken_link\">The article from winespectator dives in the details of such protection.<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p><span class=\"rt-reading-time\" style=\"display: block;\"><span class=\"rt-label rt-prefix\">tdl<\/span> <span class=\"rt-time\">&lt;\u00a01<\/span> <span class=\"rt-label rt-postfix\">minute<\/span><\/span> The article from winespectator dives in the details of such protection.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"link","meta":{"sfsi_plus_gutenberg_text_before_share":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_show_text_before_share":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_icon_type":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_icon_alignemt":"","sfsi_plus_gutenburg_max_per_row":"","spay_email":""},"categories":[183],"tags":[414],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1986"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1986"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1986\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1989,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1986\/revisions\/1989"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1986"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1986"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wine-law.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1986"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}